|
|
51 Survivors' Stories Testimonies of Tibetans who have suffered at the hands of their Chinese occupiers 2. China’s Major Prisons and Detention Centres in Tibet 3. Glossary of terms and abbreviations Boycott China for Tibet Homepage |
|
Tibetan refugee describes torture and extortion by Chinese soldiers, 12-24-03 NGAWANG SANGDROL - Interview by Al Santoli and Mahlet Getachew of the American Foreign Policy Unit, Washington, D.C. April 2003 AND testimony before the Congressional Human Rights Caucus Briefing on The Role of Women in the Tibetan Struggle for Freedom (ICT), Washington, D.C, October 31, 2003 Chuye Kunsang and Passang Lhamo See also: 'FIRE UNDER THE SNOW' - the testimony of the Venerable Palden Gyatso, now available in paperback Tsegon Gyal, former political prisoner, living under constant surveillance, 15th April, 2001 FOUR TESTIMONIES FROM
NEW REFUGEES, AFTER THEIR DANGEROUS TREK OVER THE HIMALAYAS Photojournalist Nancy Jo Johnson spent the month of March of 1998 in Dharamsala, India with Tibetan refugees. This is the fifth in a series of interviews she sent to the International Campaign for Tibet about the trek from Tibet into India. *Names have been changed to protect identities of refugees. N.B. You may still be able to ask three of the people interviewed questions by clicking the links at the end of the articles. Lhondup's* & Tashi's* Story:,March 18, 1998 - with photo Dorje's* Story: February 24 & 26, 1998 - with photo Tenzin's* Story, March 2, 1998 Lhamo*: March 6, 1998 - with photo Tenzin Chokey (also see film - above) The Stories of 4 Nuns: Puntsok T., Kelsang D., Namdol T. and Ngawang J. Kelsang Pelmo (second article, with photo) DAWA (NGAWANG) KYIZOM 2. Dawa Kyizom (with photo)(a second article) 3. Ngawang Kyizom (aka Dawa Kyizom, third article) DORJEE TSETEN Dorjee Tseten (see also article above). Ngawang Choedon (also see interview with Erling Söderström below) NGAWANG CHOEDON (interview with Erling Söderström) Thupten Tsering (with photo)(see article below, also titled 'Thupten Tsering') Thupten Tsering (with photo)(see article above) Testimonies taken from the Gu-Chu-Sum movement, association of Tibetan prisoners of conscience (the following thirteen) Venerable Yeshe Togden, director of Gu-Chu-Sum Association of Tibetan Prisoners of Conscience Ngawang Wangdon, Tibetan nun speaks of torture by China. By Janice Tang, Japan Today, Thursday, November 07, 2002IntroductionEach year Tibetans are arrested for the peaceful expression of their political or religious beliefs. Individuals may be imprisoned for the simple act of carrying a photograph of the Dalai Lama, for speaking the words “Free Tibet”, or for distributing materials calling for respect for human rights. There are currently more than 1,200 known Tibetan political prisoners in various Chinese prisons in Tibet. Thousands more have been detained since Chinese forces first entered Tibetan territory in 1949: thousands of men, women and children deprived of their freedom and separated from their family for inconceivably long periods. Detention conditions in these prisons are chilling: a monstrous range of torture methods, physical and psychological, are used to obtain “confessions” or simply as an everyday humiliation. Some prisoners have spent decades behind bars and some have been imprisoned many times, re-arrested over and over for demonstrating the same beliefs that years of prison “reform” have not succeeded in extinguishing. Most prisoners are denied visits and contact with the outside world. Some have died in custody as a result of prolonged torture and inhuman living conditions. Each year since the relaxing of the Tibet-Nepal border in 1980, Tibetans have been fleeing the persecution and repressive policies sanctioned by the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Thousands of Tibetans risk the hazardous Himalayan mountain crossing to make their way to freedom and to recount what is happening in their homeland. Some of these Tibetans are former political prisoners. Their testimonies are a crucial insight into the continuing, systematic cruelty employed in Chinese-administered prisons, detention centres and labour camps. “Verdict first, trial second” - China’s criminal justice system Politically motivated prosecution and disregard for due process continue to be sanctioned in the PRC’s judicial system which fails dismally to meet international standards. Despite modifications to the Chinese Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) put into effect in 1997, arrest without warrant or charge, prolonged detention without trial and denial of access to legal counsel are still commonplace for Tibetan political prisoners. Many prisoners report being tortured during interrogation to “confess to their crimes” and closed trials in cases involving “state secrets” are still permitted under the revised law. A common Chinese maxim sums up the China’s criminal procedure: xian pan hou shen ? “verdict first, trial second”. The guilt of the accused is generally decided during pre-trial investigation by committees made up of PSB or Party representatives. Of the five forms of pre-trial criminal detention, the only one subject to any review by a non-police organ is arrest and numerous loopholes in the original and the revised criminal provisions allow for near-indefinite custody. Administrative detention ? so-called “shelter and investigation” ? has been the most commonly applied measure as it is subject to virtually no outside checks and holding limits may be ignored. If no case can be made then a subject may be released without ever being charged. A suspect is generally held completely incommunicado during the investigation period. Revised provisions requiring police to notify a suspect’s family within 24 hours of placing him or her in detention may be dispensed with and the right to counsel may be denied in cases dealing with “state secrets” ? a term expansively used in China and particularly invoked in cases of political activism. There is no known case of a Tibetan receiving legal assistance prior to or during trial proceedings. “Leniency for those who confess” The internationally recognised right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty has not been incorporated into Chinese criminal provisions. The right to remain silent is also absent. Since the guilt of a suspect is generally pre-determined, refusal to confess is seen simply as a sign of obstinacy and disobedience. “Lenience for those who confess, severity for those who resist” (tanbai congkuan, kangju songyan), officials threaten detained suspects. Methods of extracting a “confession” from a suspect include extensive interrogation and torture sessions. Suspects, already severed from the outside world, are worn down by hours or days of repetitive questioning; weakened by food, water and sleep deprivation; broken by physical and mental abuse. Their “confession” will later be used against them in sentencing. Lao jiao ? “re-education through labour” In March 1996, the Administrative Punishments Law (APL) was passed. While the CPL is the statute governing punishment under the criminal law, the APL governs “administrative sanction”. Administrative sanctions are frequently used against Tibetan suspects and the system of lao jiao ? “re-education through labour” ? has been retained under the new revisions. While “re-education through labour” theoretically applies principally to those who commit minor offences falling short of “crimes”, it has been widely used against political dissidents and Tibetan nationalists. Such a sentence is determined by a Re-education Through Labour Management Committee made up primarily of PSB representatives. There is no right to counsel or to a hearing and individuals may be detained in labour camps for as long as three years, with a one year extension for “failure to reform”. Lao gai ? “reform through labour” The Chinese criminal system in its entirety is known as lao gai ? “reform through labour”. Its basic aim is not simply punishment but also “reform and change for the better”. In addition to intensive labour requirements ? effective both in diminishing individual political zeal and in creating production profits -? inmates of prisons and camps are also required to undergo strenuous ideological training. This includes admitting their “criminal” past and promising to “reform” themselves according to communist doctrine. The division of Tibetan political prisoners between prisons and labour camps is unclear. Sometimes the more “sensitive”, long-term political prisoners may be sent to prisons where they can be held in isolation. In other areas of Tibet all political prisoners who have been criminally sentenced go to prison. All prisoners receiving administrative sentences, in theory, are sent to separate “re-education through labour” camps. Ultimately, there is little real difference between the placements as prisoners in prisons must also work, often in on-site factories. Labour camp prisoners may be involved in heavy farming, mining or construction rock, sometimes in desolate, inhospitable areas of Tibet. “Reform” labour is mandatory for nine to ten hours a day with one day off every fortnight. In certain seasons prisoners may be expected to work 12 hours a day or even more if a particular timetable must be met. Those administratively sentenced to re-education through labour are purportedly paid for their work, but the minimal payment rarely covers more than their food and electricity charges. In some cases, Tibetan political prisoners are made to continue working even after completing their term. This may occur where the prisoner cannot show he or she has anything to return to, or where it is deemed that the prisoner has “failed to reform”. These workers are still kept largely as prisoners and only occasionally are permitted to leave to visit family. After release When eventually released, a former political prisoner will be discriminated against in employment and social services. If they are a monk or nun they will be forbidden from rejoining any monastery or nunnery. They may be watched and followed; their families may also be targeted for suspicion or disadvantage. The chance of re-arrest is great. Under such circumstances, many former political prisoners make the harrowing choice to leave their family and homeland and make a new life in exile. Even if they survive the journey, the horror and trauma they have experienced do not cease. There are today approximately 500 former political prisoners struggling to live in exile. Long and brutal detentions have left physical and mental scars: they are haunted by nightmares of their past; some are crippled; some suffer chronic depression; many are alone. Trauma and confusion associated with adjusting to an unfamiliar environment, language, culture and way of life is inevitable. Upon their arrival in Nepal and India, the Tibetan Reception Centre assist them with temporary provision of food, shelter, medical care and assistance with travel to the most appropriate place of settlement. However, in the period from 1989 to 1996 alone, the Reception Centre received 19,339 new arrivals from Tibet. The massive pressures on the resources of the Reception Centre mean that former political prisoners do not always receive particular attention; it may seem for many that their individual contribution to the Tibetan struggle has been in vain. It wasn’t. The accounts compiled here tell the stories of twenty remarkable Tibetans who have undergone what most of us could never even imagine. They are stories of great suffering, great sacrifice and great spirit. For each one of these stories told, there are a hundred more untold. These are stories which at present have no end. China's major prisons and detention centres in Tibet Drapchi
Prison The only prison acknowledged by China to exist in Tibet. Known as Drapchi, after the neighbourhood in Lhasa where it is located in the north-eastern outskirts of Lhasa. Over 600 inmates, including some 350 known political prisoners. Drapchi is for judicially-sentenced prisoners only. While Chinese authorities have told visitors that the men detained there are those serving five years or more, many Drapchi prisoners are in fact serving lighter sentences. All women who have been serving judicially in political cases, regardless of the length of their sentences, are sent to Drapchi. There may be a labour camp/s attached to Drapchi. Sangyip Officially
known as PAP (People’s Armed Police) No. 1 Branch
“Unit
no. 1” (Ch: Di yi zhidui)
TAR
Detention (Observation) Centre
“Unit
no. 5” (Ch: Di wu zhidui) Note: A new modern prison has been built in the northern outskirts of Lhasa which may be intended as a higher security facility or a city or prefectural level Public Security Bureau Detention centre. It has two cell blocks and possibly a third with 12 to 14 cells each. It is located about 100 yards south-west of Outridu prison and it seems likely to be part of the Sangyip complex. Its name is unknown but, if part of Sangyip, may be named “liutridou” (Tibetan transliteration of the Chinese word liu zhidui) meaning “sixth unit”. Sanyip Prison and Seitru are the only sections of Sangyip known to be holding political prisoners, but due to scarcity of information the reality may be quite different. Gutsa
(or Gurtsa) Detention centre for the prefecture of Lhasa located three miles east of Lhasa near the Kyichu river. Holds prisoners who are being investigated. They have either been “arrested” (i.e. charged) or given administrative sentences. Reported in 1990 to have included a kind of juvenile detention centre and there may be a separate women’s section named “Chinyugoa”, located right behind Gutsa, although other reports say women are kept within Gutsa itself. 138 people were listed as detained there in August 1995 for political offences. At present we have details of 64 political prisoners known to be under detention. Many of the political detainees were transferred to Trisam in 1992. Gutsa is also believed to incorporate sections which are used as Re-education-through-Labour centres. Trisam
Prison A new Re-education-through-Labour centre, probably for the Lhasa municipality. Located in Toelung, 10 km west of Lhasa. Opened in about February 1992 and received many of the political prisoners from Sangyip. There are three units; the first for political prisoners, the second for on-political and the third for women. Although the prison seems to specialise in political prisoners, there are currently 11 known political prisoners detained in Trisam. Powo
Tramo Labour Camp The Chinese Government has acknowledged the existence of a “Reform Labour Detachment” in or near the town of Tramo in Powo County, 500 km east of Lhasa. Powo Tramo is run by the regional authorities for sentenced long-term prisoners and 11 current political prisoners are known to be held there. Glossary of terms and abbreviations Barkhor
- central circumambulation and market area around the Jokhang Temple
|
|